Parents tend to expect an illness to show itself. Lead usually doesn’t. According to CDC, a child with lead poisoning may not have visible signs or symptoms, and a blood lead test is the best way to find out whether a child has lead poisoning. That means a blood lead test for children is less a response to sickness than a check on circumstances: the age of the home, the household’s work and hobbies, the child’s age.
CDC says most children with any lead in their blood have no obvious immediate symptoms. The agency also states that no safe blood lead level in children has been identified, and that even low levels of lead in blood are associated with developmental delays, difficulty learning, and behavioral issues. Taken together, these two statements explain why testing matters. If you wait for signs, you may be waiting for something that never shows up.
Age matters too. Children younger than 6 years are more likely to be exposed due to their hand-to-mouth behavior, and many children ingest lead dust by putting objects such as toys and dirt in their mouths. That’s normal toddler behavior, not carelessness. CDC also stresses that lead exposure is preventable. A test result tells families and providers whether prevention steps need to start.
CDC’s position is that all children who are at risk for lead exposure should be tested for lead poisoning. Its list of childhood lead exposure risk factors includes children who:
The 1978 cutoff is about paint: older homes and buildings may be painted with lead-based paint. The job-and-hobby items reflect a second route, since children may also be exposed through their parents and caregivers. For where children’s lead exposure comes from and what parents can do about it at home, see WellOfNess’s guide to children and heavy metals.
If you’re not sure where your family fits, the child’s healthcare provider may ask questions to see if the child is at risk. Questionnaires help, but they can miss children. A 2007 report from CDC’s advisory committee found that to identify approximately 80% of children with BLLs > 10 µg/dL, a blood test had to be performed for more than half of those children who had been assessed by questionnaire. Answering questions is a good start. It doesn’t replace a blood test.
Children enrolled in Medicaid are required to get tested for lead at ages 12 and 24 months. They are also required to get tested if they are ages 24–72 months and have no record of ever being tested. For children not on Medicaid, CDC recommends focusing testing efforts on high-risk neighborhoods and children.
That targeted approach depends on local knowledge. CDC asks public health and clinical professionals to develop screening plans responsive to local conditions, using local data. Where no such plan exists, universal BLL testing is recommended.
The same advisory committee report explains why two early screenings make sense. Exposures might change with a child’s developmental progress (e.g., walking or reaching window sills), or with family moves and home remodeling.
A capillary test is usually the first step, using blood from a finger or heel. Finger-prick tests can provide fast results. However, they also can produce higher results if lead on the skin is captured in the sample.
Careful collection reduces this problem. CDC’s advisory committee noted that contamination by lead from the skin surface can be minimized if a protocol for proper capillary specimen collection is followed. Even so, capillary levels will vary from those of a simultaneously drawn venous sample.
That’s why the second test exists. A venous draw takes blood from a vein, can take a few days to receive results, and is often used to confirm blood lead levels seen in the first capillary test. Labs can analyze both sample types with methods such as ICP-MS or GFAAS, but venous samples are more reliable at identifying lower blood lead levels. If the first test was already venous, the patient does not need another venous draw. The recommended schedule for obtaining a confirmatory venous sample is within 3 months for a capillary level of ≥3.5–9 μg/dL, within 1 month for 10–19 μg/dL, within 2 weeks for 20–44 μg/dL, and within 48 hours for ≥45 μg/dL.
CDC uses a blood lead reference value of 3.5 µg/dL. The reference value is not health-based and is not a regulatory standard. It’s a screening tool that flags children who have higher levels of lead in their blood compared with most children. CDC estimates that approximately 500,000 children in the United States have BLLs at or above the BLRV.
The value has moved over time, as CDC’s surveillance page describes: until 2012, children were identified as having a blood lead “level of concern” if the test result was 10 or more micrograms per deciliter (µg/dL) of lead in blood, a term CDC no longer uses.
| Date | Event | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Until 2012 | ”Level of concern” at 10 µg/dL | Term no longer used by CDC |
| 2012 | Reference value set at 5 µg/dL | 97.5th percentile, NHANES 2007–2010 |
| 2021 | Reference value updated to 3.5 µg/dL | More children identified, so families can act earlier |
If a child’s level is 3.5 µg/dL or higher, CDC recommends that the child be referred for a follow-up venous blood test. A result counts as confirmed with one venous blood test ≥ 3.5 μg/dL or two capillary blood tests ≥ 3.5 μg/dL drawn within 12 weeks of each other. When a report comes back, WellOfNess’s guide to reading a heavy metals blood test walks through what the lab sheet shows, line by line.
Healthcare providers and most local health departments can test for lead in the blood. Many private insurance policies cover the cost, and for children on Medicaid, the cost is covered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
To sum up: if your child fits any of CDC’s risk categories, or you just don’t know, ask the pediatrician about testing. If the finger-prick result comes back high, expect a venous draw to confirm it before anyone draws conclusions.